GIFT City in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, has moved up 9 places to 37th in the 40th edition of the Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI 40), published on 16 September 2026. It was 46th in GFCI 39. GIFT City is now the only Indian financial centre in the Asia-Pacific top 15, and its FinTech rank improved to 26th. Mumbai rose to 49th. The index is published by Z/Yen Partners and the China Development Institute. The rise signals growing global confidence in India's International Financial Services Centre, regulated by IFSCA.
The 40th edition of the Global Financial Centres Index was published on 16 September 2026. GIFT City climbed 9 places to 37th, from 46th in GFCI 39. It also rose 3 places to 26th in the FinTech ranking. Mumbai moved up 3 places to 49th.
Core Concept: International Financial Services Centre (IFSC)
Q1. What is GIFT City's rank in the Global Financial Centres Index 40 (2026)? [Easy]
A) 26th
B) 37th
C) 46th
D) 49th
Answer: B
Explanation: GIFT City ranked 37th in GFCI 40, up 9 places.
Q2. Who publishes the Global Financial Centres Index? [Easy]
A) World Bank and IMF
B) World Economic Forum
C) Bank for International Settlements
D) Z/Yen Partners and China Development Institute
Answer: D
Explanation: The GFCI is published jointly by Z/Yen Partners of London and the China Development Institute.
Q3. What was GIFT City's rank in GFCI 39 (March 2026)? [Moderate]
A) 46th
B) 37th
C) 52nd
D) 29th
Answer: A
Explanation: GIFT City was 46th in GFCI 39 and moved up 9 places to 37th in GFCI 40.
Q4. What is GIFT City's FinTech ranking in GFCI 40? [Moderate]
A) 15th
B) 29th
C) 26th
D) 37th
Answer: C
Explanation: GIFT City's FinTech rank improved from 29th to 26th.
Q5. Which body regulates the International Financial Services Centre at GIFT City? [Moderate]
A) Reserve Bank of India
B) International Financial Services Centres Authority
C) Securities and Exchange Board of India
D) Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Answer: B
Explanation: IFSCA is the unified regulator for financial services in IFSCs.
Q6. Which statement about Indian centres in GFCI 40 is correct? [Tricky]
A) Mumbai ranks above GIFT City.
B) Both GIFT City and Mumbai are in the Asia-Pacific top 15.
C) Mumbai fell 3 places.
D) GIFT City is the only Indian centre in the Asia-Pacific top 15.
Answer: D
Explanation: GIFT City (37th) is the only Indian centre in the Asia-Pacific top 15; Mumbai rose 3 places to 49th.
Q7. Which centre ranked 1st in GFCI 39 (March 2026)? [Tricky]
A) London
B) Singapore
C) New York
D) Hong Kong
Answer: C
Explanation: In GFCI 39, New York was 1st, London 2nd and Hong Kong 3rd.
Q8. Which of the following is NOT one of the GFCI's five areas of competitiveness? [Tricky]
A) Natural Resources
B) Human Capital
C) Reputation
D) Infrastructure
Answer: A
Explanation: The five areas are Business Environment, Human Capital, Infrastructure, Financial Sector Development and Reputation.
PYQ 1:
The 40th edition of the Global Financial Centres Index was published in:
A) March 2026
B) December 2025
C) September 2026
D) March 2027
Answer: C
Explanation: GFCI 40 was published on 16 September 2026.
PYQ 2:
Consider the following statements:
GIFT City is the only Indian financial centre in the Asia-Pacific top 15 of GFCI 40.
GIFT City's rank in GFCI 40 is lower than its rank in GFCI 39.
The IFSC at GIFT City is regulated by IFSCA.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
A) 1 only
B) 1 and 3 only
C) 2 and 3 only
D) 1, 2 and 3
Answer: B
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct; GIFT City improved from 46th to 37th, so statement 2 is wrong.
PYQ 3:
Assertion (A): GFCI ratings reflect both hard data and market perception of financial centres.
Reason (R): The GFCI combines quantitative instrumental factors with assessments by financial professionals.
A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
B) Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
C) A is true, but R is false
D) A is false, but R is true
Answer: A
Explanation: GFCI 40 used 144 instrumental factors and 39,531 assessments, which is why it captures both data and perception.
Question 1 (150 words): What does GIFT City's rise in the GFCI 40 indicate about India's financial sector ambitions?
GIFT City's rise to 37th in GFCI 40, from 46th in GFCI 39, shows that India's effort to build a globally competitive financial hub is gaining traction.
The GFCI blends 144 instrumental factors with 39,531 professional assessments. A 9-place jump therefore reflects both better fundamentals and better perception among global financiers. The FinTech rank rising to 26th shows strength in digital finance.
GIFT City is now the only Indian centre in the Asia-Pacific top 15, and GFCI 40 expects it to grow in significance over the next two to three years. This supports India's aim of bringing offshore financial activity of Indian firms back onshore.
To sustain the momentum, India should strengthen digital infrastructure, anti-money-laundering frameworks and capital market depth, as the index itself highlights.
Question 2 (250 words): Examine the role of International Financial Services Centres in India's economic strategy. What challenges must GIFT City overcome to become a top global financial hub?
IFSCs let India offer cross-border financial services from its own soil, competing with hubs that have long served Indian businesses from abroad.
India's IFSC framework rests on the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, and the IFSCA Act, 2019, which created a single regulator for banking, capital markets and insurance in IFSCs. This unified model reduces regulatory friction for global firms.
The results are visible. In GFCI 40, published on 16 September 2026, GIFT City rose from 46th to 37th and became the only Indian centre in the Asia-Pacific top 15. Its FinTech rank improved to 26th. Mumbai also rose to 49th.
Economically, a strong IFSC can retain fee income, jobs and capital within India. Strategically, it can support wider use of Indian financial markets by global investors.
However, challenges remain. The leading hubs in GFCI 39 — New York, London, Hong Kong, Singapore and San Francisco — have deep talent pools, legal certainty and long reputations. GFCI 40 itself points to gaps in digital infrastructure, digital-asset policy, anti-money-laundering frameworks and capital market depth.
India should therefore build specialised financial talent, ensure predictable tax and regulatory policy, strengthen dispute resolution, and deepen liquidity in IFSC markets. Consistent reform, rather than one-time incentives, will decide whether GIFT City can keep climbing the rankings.