The Centre extended the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, in specified areas of Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh for another six months with effect from 1 October 2026. The Ministry of Home Affairs issued the notifications on 25 September 2026 after reviewing the law and order situation. The whole of Manipur stays a disturbed area except areas under 13 police stations. Nine full districts of Nagaland and three districts of Arunachal Pradesh remain covered. For exams this links internal security, Section 3 of the Act, Centre-State powers and the long debate on repealing the law.
The Union Home Ministry extended the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, in specified areas of three north-eastern States for a further six months. The notifications were issued on 25 September 2026 and take effect from 1 October 2026. The step followed a review of the law and order situation in each area. The extension continues the disturbed area status in Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh, with the same pattern of exclusions as before.
The notifications were dated 25 September 2026 and the extension begins on 1 October 2026, running for six months unless withdrawn earlier. The areas lie in Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh, three States of India's North-East. Arunachal Pradesh shares a long boundary with China, while Nagaland and Manipur share borders with Myanmar. The Namsai police station areas in Arunachal Pradesh sit on the Assam border, which explains their separate treatment.
The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act was enacted in 1958 for the Naga Hills area of the then State of Assam, where armed insurgency had begun. It was later extended to more of the North-East as conflicts spread, and separate legislation applied similar powers in Punjab and in Jammu and Kashmir. Opposition grew through the 1990s and 2000s. The Supreme Court examined the Act in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India in 1997 and upheld its constitutional validity while laying down safeguards. The Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy Committee, set up in 2004, recommended in its 2005 report that the Act be repealed. Successive governments have instead narrowed its geographical reach, and the current notification continues that pattern of partial coverage rather than blanket application.
India uses a statute with a fixed-term declaration that must be renewed, in this case every six months, rather than a permanent emergency law. Many countries handle armed internal conflict through general emergency provisions that suspend rights broadly. The Indian design is narrower in area but has been criticised for lasting decades in some regions. Within India itself the comparison is instructive: Tripura ended AFSPA in 2015 and the disturbed area coverage in Nagaland, Assam and Manipur was cut in April 2022, showing that the law contracts as security improves. The current notification covers three States rather than the whole North-East.
Core Concept: The disturbed area declaration under AFSPA
Q1. From which date does the latest extension of AFSPA in Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh take effect? [Easy]
A) 1 October 2026
B) 25 September 2026
C) 1 April 2026
D) 26 September 2026
Answer: A
Explanation: The notifications were issued on 25 September 2026 and the extension takes effect from 1 October 2026 for six months.
Q2. Which ministry issues disturbed area notifications under AFSPA? [Easy]
A) Ministry of Defence
B) Ministry of Law and Justice
C) Ministry of External Affairs
D) Ministry of Home Affairs
Answer: D
Explanation: The Ministry of Home Affairs issued the notifications on 25 September 2026 extending the declarations by six months.
Q3. Under which section of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 is an area declared a disturbed area? [Moderate]
A) Section 2
B) Section 3
C) Section 4
D) Section 6
Answer: B
Explanation: Section 3 provides the power to declare an area a disturbed area, which is the precondition for the special powers to apply.
Q4. How many police station areas in Manipur are kept outside the disturbed area declaration? [Moderate]
A) 9
B) 11
C) 13
D) 21
Answer: C
Explanation: The whole of Manipur is covered except the areas under 13 police stations, which lie in five districts.
Q5. Which of the following districts of Arunachal Pradesh is covered by the latest AFSPA notification? [Moderate]
A) Longding
B) Tawang
C) Ziro
D) Itanagar Capital Complex
Answer: A
Explanation: Tirap, Changlang and Longding districts of Arunachal Pradesh remain covered, along with three police station areas in Namsai district.
Q6. Which of the following pairs is correctly matched with respect to AFSPA, 1958? [Tricky]
A) Section 3 — powers of the armed forces in a disturbed area
B) Section 4 — declaration of a disturbed area
C) Section 6 — prior sanction of the Central Government for prosecution
D) Section 2 — repeal of the Act
Answer: C
Explanation: Section 6 requires prior sanction of the Central Government before prosecuting a person acting under the Act.
Q7. Which Nagaland district is among the nine covered entirely by the latest notification? [Tricky]
A) Kohima
B) Wokha
C) Meluri
D) Zunheboto
Answer: C
Explanation: Meluri is one of the nine fully covered districts; Kohima, Wokha and Zunheboto are among the districts where only certain police station areas are covered.
Q8. Which statement about the latest AFSPA extension is correct? [Tricky]
A) It applies to the whole of the North-East region
B) It is for six months and may be withdrawn earlier
C) It was issued under Article 355 of the Constitution
D) It makes the declaration permanent in Manipur
Answer: B
Explanation: The declaration runs for six months from 1 October 2026 and the Centre can lift it earlier if conditions improve.
PYQ 1:
In which year was the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act enacted, and for which region was it originally applied?
A) 1950, Jammu and Kashmir
B) 1955, Punjab
C) 1958, the Naga Hills area
D) 1967, the whole of the North-East
Answer: C
Explanation: The Act was enacted in 1958 and applied initially to the Naga Hills area of the then State of Assam.
PYQ 2:
Consider the following statements:
The latest AFSPA extension takes effect from 1 October 2026.
The declarations were made under Section 3 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958.
The entire State of Nagaland has been declared a disturbed area under this notification.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
A) 1 only
B) 1 and 2 only
C) 2 and 3 only
D) All of the above
Answer: B
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong, because nine districts and 21 police station areas of Nagaland are covered, not the whole State.
PYQ 3:
Assertion (A): A disturbed area notification under AFSPA has to be renewed from time to time.
Reason (R): The Act requires every declaration to be made for a fixed period, after which it lapses unless extended.
A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
B) Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
C) A is true but R is false
D) A is false but R is true
Answer: A
Explanation: The current declarations run for six months from 1 October 2026, so a fresh review and notification are needed to continue them.
Question 1 (150 words): Explain why the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 requires a disturbed area declaration, and what the latest notification shows about how the law is now applied.
The Act requires a declaration because the special powers it grants are treated as an exception, not the normal rule of policing.
Section 3 allows an area to be declared a disturbed area, and only then do the powers under the Act operate there. This design keeps three limits in place. The powers apply to a defined area, for a defined period, and only after the Centre has reviewed the situation. The notifications issued on 25 September 2026, effective from 1 October 2026 for six months, follow exactly this route.
The latest notification also shows how the law has narrowed. The whole of Manipur is covered except areas under 13 police stations. Nagaland has nine full districts plus 21 police station areas, and Arunachal Pradesh only three districts and three police station areas.
Coverage now follows assessed conditions rather than whole regions.
Question 2 (250 words): Critically examine the continued extension of AFSPA in parts of the North-East in the light of constitutional provisions, judicial pronouncements and committee recommendations.
The extension of AFSPA in parts of Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh from 1 October 2026 keeps alive a debate that is now more than six decades old.
Constitutionally, the law sits at a difficult junction. Police and public order are State subjects, while deployment of the armed forces of the Union in a State in aid of the civil power is a Union subject. Article 355 casts a duty on the Union to protect States against internal disturbance, and central action is usually justified on that basis. Critics reply that this reading lets the Centre keep special powers in force in areas where the State machinery is functioning.
Judicially, the position is settled but conditional. In Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India, decided in 1997, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Act while reading in safeguards on how the powers must be used. Section 6, which bars prosecution without prior sanction of the Central Government, remains the most contested provision, because it is seen as blunting accountability.
On policy, the Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy Committee recommended repeal in its 2005 report, and no government has accepted that recommendation. What has happened instead is gradual contraction. Tripura withdrew the Act in 2015, disturbed areas were reduced in Nagaland, Assam and Manipur in April 2022, and the present notification covers three States with listed exclusions rather than the region as a whole.
A credible way forward is to tie each renewal to published security criteria and to faster decisions on sanction requests.